Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Temporary Right Of Entry
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26633842 - June 4, 2026 Hearing date: June 4, 2026 Case number: CGC26633842 Case title: JANYAPORN PHUCHAREON VS. FRED BERNARD ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26633842 | Case Title: | | JANYAPORN PHUCHAREON VS. FRED BERNARD ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Temporary Right Of Entry | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 4, 2026. Line 3.
PLAINTIFF JANYAPORN PHUCHAREON Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Temporary Right Of Entry is DENIED without prejudice. There is no Proof of Service of the Complaint on file and Defendant has not appeared in the action.
California Rules of Court requires that an OSC must be used "if the party against whom the preliminary injunction is sought has not appeared in the action. If the responding party has not appeared, the OSC must be served in the same manner as a summons and complaint." (CRC 3.1150(a).) An OSC has not been issued in this case. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”