Jiaojiao Ye vs Tracy Chang et al

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: June 4, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 4

LINE 2 25CV469138

Jiaojiao Ye vs Tracy Chang et al Demurrer Defendant Chang filed this demurrer to the complaint on September 5, 2025, the motion was accompanied by a proof of service indicating electronic service to the plaintiff on that same day. An additional proof of service via electronic service was filed on September 24, 2026.

The motion is unopposed. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b) opposition papers were due on May 21, 2026. No opposition papers were filed. A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion. (California Rule of Court Rule 8.54(c); Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410). Failure to oppose a motion leads to the presumption that the plaintiff has no meritorious arguments. (Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, 489).

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, a party may demur to a complaint on the grounds that it “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” (