Petition to Revoke Probate of Purported Lost Will; Petition for Order Granting Authorized Access to Review a Confidential Filed
PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 7 | 14
PR0001465 IN THE MATTER OF DONALD E. JENSEN AND BILLIE B. JENSEN REVOCABLE L IVING TRUST
Petition for Order Confirming Trust Assets and for Instructions, filed by Mark Jensen and Andrea Guarino-Slemmons on 9/12/25.
Ruling. The parties are ordered to appear to address the following: Proof that the Stifel Account and that the safe deposit box were assets in existence at the time of creation of the Trust, or why a declaration should not be filed explaining further why these assets should be transferred to the Trust. Additionally, (2) whether all interested parties received notice. (3) legal authority for request for instructions with respect to dispositive provisions.
PR0001547 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN MICHAEL PITMAN
1. Petition to Revoke Probate of Purported Lost Will of John Michael Pitman, filed by Elizabeth Brooks on 4/17/26.
2. Petition for Order Granting Authorized Access to Review a Confidential Filed, filed by William Bruce Pitman on 4/29/26.
Ruling. The parties are ordered to appear.
PR0001681 IN THE MATTER OF JEAN VIA DE LA VISTA TRUST
1. Petition for Construction of Trust and Order Voiding Co-Trustee’s Authority to Unilaterally Seek Partition of Real Property Belonging to the Trust, filed by Michael Barnett on 2/25/26.
2. Petition to Remove Co-Trustee Michael Barnett, filed by Charles Barnett on 5/1/26.
Ruling. The parties are ordered to appear.
PR0001734 IN THE MATTER OF BARBARA LEE MAHONEY
Petition for Letters of Administration, filed by Danielle Lacampagne on 3/25/26.
Ruling. Petitioner’s Counsel is ordered to appear to address why the original will has not been lodged with the Court.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”