DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001583·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoThe parties are ordered to appear.

IN THE MATTER OF JUDITH YOUNGMAN

Amended Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerAnne F. Smith

Attorneys

Anne F. Smithfor Petitioner

Ruling

PR0001583 IN THE MATTER OF JUDITH YOUNGMAN

Amended Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator of the Person and Estate, filed by Anne F. Smith on 2/24/26.

Ruling. The Parties are ordered to appear. If this Petition is granted, Conservators shall comply with the following future dates: 1. Confidential Conservatorship Care Plan. a. A status hearing for the filing of the Confidential Conservatorship Care Plan shall be set on September 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. b. An appearance will be required on that date if the Confidential Conservatorship Care Plan is not filed at least five court days prior to the hearing.

2. Final Inventory and Appraisal. a. A status hearing for the filing of the Final Inventory and Appraisal shall be set on September 24, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. b. An appearance will be required on that date if the Final I&A is not filed at least five court days prior to hearing.

3. First Account. a. A First Account for the period ending 5/20/27 shall be filed by July 29, 2027. b. A hearing shall be set on July 29, 2027, at 1:30 p.m. for either: (1) hearing on the First Account; or (2) explanation as to why it was not timely filed.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 14 | 15

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share