DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
RG21096898·alameda·Civil·Privacy/Data Rights
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc.

Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jun 16, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffValeria Thais SuÆrez Rojas
PlaintiffReyna Maldonado
PlaintiffLisa Knox
PlaintiffMijente Support Committee
PlaintiffNorcal Resist Fund

Attorneys

Lesley M. Nashfor Plaintiff

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 06/03/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by Malkia Devich Cyril (Plaintiff) + CRS# 720274073774 in Department 18 Tentative Ruling - 05/29/2026 Patrick McKinney

The Motion for Lesley M. Nash ("Applicant") to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Valeria Thais SuÆrez Rojas, Reyna Maldonado, Lisa Knox, Mijente Support Committee, and Norcal Resist Fund is GRANTED. The Application substantially complies with the requirements of CRC Rule 9.40.

Pursuant to Government Code section 70617(e)(2), on or before the anniversary of the date of this order Pro Hac Vice Applicant Lesley M. Nash (representing Plaintiffs) shall pay a renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that Pro Hac Vice Applicant maintains pro hac vice status in this case.

The Court hereby sets a compliance hearing for 06/16/2027 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. If the renewal fee has been paid at least 10 calendar days before the hearing, no appearance will be required.

Plaintiffs’ counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share