DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
RG21096898·alameda·Civil·Privacy/Data Rights
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc.

Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Jul 7, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffRenderos
DefendantClearview AI, Inc.
PlaintiffNorcal Resist Fund
PlaintiffLisa Knox
PlaintiffMijente Support Committee
PlaintiffValeria Thais Suarez Rojas
PlaintiffReyna Maldonado
PlaintiffMalkia Devich Cyril

Attorneys

Samuel B. Reillyfor Plaintiff
Matthew Bordenfor Plaintiff
J. Noah Hageyfor Plaintiff
Kory DeClarkfor Plaintiff
Tracy O. Zinsoufor Plaintiff

Ruling

RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 07/08/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by Malkia Devich Cyril (Plaintiff) + CRS# 831263855167 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 07/07/2026 Patrick McKinney

The Motion to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by Norcal Resist Fund, Lisa Knox, Mijente Support Committee, Valeria Thais Suarez Rojas, Reyna Maldonado, Malkia Devich Cyril on 06/04/2026 is Granted.

The Application of Samuel B. Reilly (“Counsel”) to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.) Counsel is a member in good standing with the State of Georgia Bar and pending admission with New York. He has been associated with Matthew Borden, J. Noah Hagey, Kory DeClark, and Tracy O. Zinsou, counsel of record, all active members of the California State Bar. (Reilly Application ¶ 7.) In the preceding two years, counsel has not applied to appear pro hac vice to defend actions in California. (Reilly Decl. at ¶ 6.) Court records reflect that counsel has submitted an application fee of five hundred dollars ($500) (Govt. Code § 70617(e)(2)).)

Defendant filed an opposition claiming that Mr. Reilly has been improperly acting as “lead counsel” despite not being admitted to practice in California. The contentions are not supported by evidence other than a self-serving declaration from counsel. The court does not find this sufficient to warrant denial of the application.

The Court sets a compliance date for Wednesday, July 7, 2027 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 18. If the renewal fee has been paid at least 10 calendar days before the hearing then no appearance will be required. The clerk is directed to serve endorsed-file copies of this order, with proof of service to all counsel and any self-represented parties of record by mail.

CONTESTING TENTATIVE ORDERS

Notify the Court and all other parties no later than 4:00 pm the day before the scheduled hearing and identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps.

1. Log into eCourt Public Portal - https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed. RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 07/08/2026 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by Malkia Devich Cyril (Plaintiff) + CRS# 831263855167 in Department 18

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share