DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV-22-000411·stanislaus·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED, on the Court's own motion.

PEREZ, AMALIA vs KAUR, BALJINDER

Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
24
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPEREZ, AMALIA
DefendantKAUR, BALJINDER

Ruling

450 | $ 14,040.00 | Delos Santos | 11.2 | 150 | 1,680.00 | | | Total Fees | $15,720.00 | | | Costs | 2,225.85 | | | AWARD | $ 17,945.85 | CV-26-000588 - HINCHMAN, JOHN LEWIS vs REINS, TERRY - Plaintiff's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel - DENIED, without prejudice. Proof of service demonstrates insufficient notice of the instant motion.(Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 1005(b).) The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-000411 - PEREZ, AMALIA vs KAUR, BALJINDER - Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel - CONTINUED, on the Court's own motion.

The Court notes no indication in the Court files that Plaintiff's Counsel has taken steps to serve the client at his last known address, as required by the Court. Accordingly, this matter is continued to Tuesday, June 16 at 8:30 am in Department 24 of this Court for Plaintiff's Counsel to discharge that obligation. CV-24-001479 - CARRANZA, RAFAELA CERVANTES vs VOLK ENTERPRISES INC - Plaintiff's Motion for

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share