Conservatorship of Arturo Manuel Cruz

Plaintiffs’ assertion that it requested the bank statements and tax returns sought by the instant motion. (See Quantum Cooking, supra, 197 Cal.App.4th 927, 934 (Quantum Cooking) [“Rules of Court rule 3.1113 rests on a policy-based allocation of resources, preventing the trial court from being cast as a tacit advocate for the moving party's theories by freeing it from any obligation to comb the record and the law for factual and legal support that a party has failed to identify or provide”].)

Second, there appears to be no evidence tending to show that the specific documents that Plaintiffs seek by the instant Motion are in Mr. Ospeck’s possession, custody, or control. In this context, Ospeck contends, through the Opposition, that he “has already produced documents within his possession, custody, and control.” (Id. at 4:18-19.)

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs’ motion for an order compelling Mr. Ospeck to produce bank statements and tax returns is DENIED.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Estate of Eleazar Ramirez 23PR000319

PETITION FOR SECOND AMENDED ORDER FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION; CONFIRMATION OF DISTRIBUTION OF OMITTED ASSET PURSUANT TO OMNIBUS CLAUSE; AND RECOGNITION OF ASSIGNMENT OF DISTRIBUTABLE INTEREST

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED.

Conservatorship of Arturo Manuel Cruz 25PR000053

REVIEW – 1ST YEAR

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on May 05, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

6