Plaintiff’s Third Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One and Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
with all documents filed with the Court and a proof of service which complies with the Code of Civil Procedure must be filed. As a result, both Defendants’ Motion for Order Compelling Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories and Compelling Responses to Supplemental Demand for Inspection and Production of Documents, are GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide code compliant responses without objections, which include verifications, to Supplemental Interrogatories (set one) and Supplemental Demand for Inspection and Production of Documents (set one) within 10 days’ notice of this order. Plaintiff is sanctioned in the amount of $508.14 per motion, for a total of $1,016.28. Sanctions are payable within 20 days’ notice of this order. Defendant shall prepare a form of order consistent with this ruling within 2 weeks.
5. 23CV01923 Greenberg, Stuart et al v. Jacques, Michael et al
EVENT: Plaintiff’s Third Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One and Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Sanctions Counsel is ordered to appear and provide the Court with an update concerning the selection of a discovery referee. At the May 20 hearing the Court directed counsel to file a status report no later than June 1. However, as of this writing there is no status report on file. Regarding the instant motion, it was filed less than one week before the hearing. Plaintiff’s counsel is admonished for failing to comply with CCP 1005 which requires the motion to be filed a minimum of 16 court days before the hearing unless otherwise authorized by the Court. This motion, along with all subsequent discovery motions, will be assigned to the discovery referee.
2|Page
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”