| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Discovery, And Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678578 - August 4, 2025 Hearing date: August 4, 2025 Case number: CUD25678578 Case title: JORDAN CLIFFORD VS. STANISLAV MOREINIS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678578 | Case Title: | | JORDAN CLIFFORD VS. STANISLAV MOREINIS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Discovery, And Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for August 4, 2025, line 7.
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Discovery, and Request for Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant. HEARING REQUIRED.
Parties to appear in-person at 8:30 a.m. on August 4, 2025 and engage in meaningful meet and confer efforts. Parties to report their progress at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall have a copy of separate statement indicating all resolved issues, to be handed to the Court. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”