DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PC-0033360·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

CONSERVATORSHIP OF HALEY JOHNSTON

Petition for Appointment of a Limited Conservator of the Person

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 22, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherHaley Johnston

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PC-0033360 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Appointment of a Limited Conservator of the Person. The matter has been properly noticed, with proof of service on file. The Citation has been filed with proper proof of service. Counsel has been appointed for the Conservatee. No objections have been raised. The Capacity Declaration has been reviewed and is accepted by the Court. The amended Court Investigator’s report filed on May 27, 2026, recommends granting the Petition.

The Court notes the attachment 1(f) of the Petition requests access to the Conservatee’s bank/financial institution accounts but does not request conservatorship of the estate. The paperwork appears to be in order, with the exception that the report of the assessment from Far Northern Regional Center has not been filed as required by Probate Code Section 1827.5. The matter is continued to Monday, June 22, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on the Petition for Appointment of a Limited Conservator of the Person.

The report of the assessment from Far Northern Regional Center is required to be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOEL MITCHELL

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share