DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVCV21-0198602·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoAppearance required

WAGNER VS. LLOYD

Review hearing

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
63
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWagner
DefendantLloyd

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVCV21-0198602 This matter is on calendar for review for status of appointment of referee. On April 8, 2026, the Court issued a statement of decision providing that the Court would appoint a referee of the parties’ choosing to facilitate the sale of the real property. No request to appoint a referee has been submitted. The parties are ordered to appear to provide the Court with a status of referee and sale of the property.

YOUNG, ET AL. VS. CHRISTENSEN, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share