DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0206961·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

HALL VS. SMISOR

Review hearing

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHall
DefendantSmisor

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0206961 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of counsel. At the prior hearing on May 26, 2026, the Court was informed that Plaintiff would be obtaining new counsel. A Substitution of Attorney was filed on June 11, 2026. The issue with counsel has been resolved. The Court notes that this matter is at issue and is ready to be set for trial. Both sides have posted jury fees. The Court designates this matter as a Plan III case and intends on setting a jury trial date no later than February 2, 2027. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to provide the Court with available trial dates.

MAGNOLIA BANK, INC. VS. ANDERSON BIO GROUP, LLC, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share