DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2025-01532461·orange·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Ngan Nguyen vs. Jesse M. Rickard, Trustee of the J&L Rickard 2006 Family Trust

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories; Motion to Deem Admitted All Matters In Plaintiff’s Requests for Admission; Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
C61
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,125

Parties

PlaintiffNgan Nguyen
DefendantJesse M. Rickard

Attorneys

Ayinde Jonesfor Defendant

Ruling

Defendants were served with the Summons and Complaint on 4/22/2026 per Proof of Service of Summons (ROA 36 & 40). Defendants filed this Motion to Dismiss (ROA 25) as their first filing with this Court.

A Motion to Dismiss is an improper responsive pleading filed after being served with a complaint in an unlawful detainer action. Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1170(a), the Defendant needs to file a motion to quash service of summons, a motion to strike, a demurrer to the complaint, or an answer.

The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

The Defendant is to file a responsive pleading consistent with California Code of Civil Procedure § 1170(a) within 5 calendar days of receiving notice of the Court’s ruling.

The Plaintiff is to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.

15 30-2025-01532461 As to the Discovery Motions, all other matters will be heard in Court: Ngan Nguyen vs. Jesse M. Rickard, Trustee of The Court has read and considered the Plaintiff’s Motions: ROA 53, ROA 54, the J&L Rickard 2006 and ROA 55. Family Trust The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories- Unlawful Detainer (Set One) is GRANTED. Defendant is hereby ordered to serve full and complete verified responses, without objection to Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer, within 5 days of service of notice hereto.

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Admitted All Matters In Plaintiff’s Requests for Admission (Set One) be and hereby is granted and that the truth of all specified matters, and the genuineness of all specified documents, in the First Set of Requests for Admissions, propounded by Plaintiff and served on Defendant on April 3, 2026, be deemed admitted.

The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents (Set One) is GRANTED. Defendant is hereby ordered to serve full and complete verified responses, without objection to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents (Set One), within 5 days of service of notice hereto.

The Court orders the Defendant’s Counsel, Ayinde Jones, SBN3 283668, forthwith to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,125 to the Plaintiff. This sum shall be made payable to "AWB Law, P.C." within 5 business days and shall be delivered to 2040 Main Street, Suite 500, Irvine, CA 92614.

The Plaintiff is ordered to provide electronic notice of this Court’s order.

17 30-2026-01547207 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Notice of Intention to Coach Royal-003, L.P. Move for New Trial and to Vacate Judgment; Combined Motion Under Code DBA Coach Royal of Civil Procedure § 657 and 663 (ROA 95) and Plaintiff’s Opposition (ROA Mobilehome Park v. 106). Marquez

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share