Nguyen v. Le

In light of the above, the Court finds that the two actions do not involve common questions of law or fact. Thus, the motion to consolidate is DENIED.

Moving party to give notice. 112 Nguyen v. Le 2024-01420730

Motions to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record - GRANTED

The unopposed motions of attorney William Kersten of Kersten & Associates to be relieved as counsel for Defendants Lan Le and Tiffany Le are GRANTED.

Service on the clients and on all other parties who have appeared in the case was proper and all required forms containing the requisite information were filed pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.

The order will take effect once moving attorney files proof of service of the signed order (MC-053) on the clients. Moving attorney to give notice. 113 Nguyen v. Westminster Manor Apartment 2024-01442534

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication - DENIED

Defendant WESTMINSTER MANOR APARTMENT (hereinafter “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on the grounds that the parties entered a GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND WAIVER pursuant to Civil Code section 1542 on August 1, 2024 which extinguished all of Defendant’s obligations to Plaintiff, including, but not limited to water intrusion and damage, mold, gas leak, and any alleged injury, discomfort, or inconvenience, suffered by Plaintiff during her tenancy through the date of vacating the premises.

The court notes that service of the motion may not have been proper. When utilizing electronic service, the proof of electronic service may be made in essentially the same manner as provided for service of papers by mail (CCP § 1013a), except that the declaration of service does not need to state that the person making the service is not a party to the action, and must state: