DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24-01431827·orange·Civil·Motion to be Relieved as Counsel
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Cecilia and John V, LLC vs. Nguyen

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
C12
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 18, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCecilia and John V, LLC
DefendantKim-Hiem Thi Nguyen

Attorneys

Shawn M. Olsen(Olsen Law Firm)for Defendant

Ruling

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange

Hon. ANDRE MANSSOURIAN Department C12 – (657) 622-5212

TENTATIVE RULINGS Court will make every effort to post tentative rulings by approximately 3:00 p.m. the court day before the date the motion is to be heard.

If the parties agree to submit on the Court’s tentative ruling, please call Department C12 directly to inform the court that all parties submit to the Court’s tentative ruling.

Reminder: Court does NOT provide court reporters.

No filings or briefs of any kind will be accepted after the tentative ruling is posted.

Parties are welcome to be present in court for the law and motion calendar or appear by Zoom. To make an appearance via Zoom please click the following link. If you are unable to log in, please call the department for an alternative arrangement. https://www.occourts.org/civil-remotehearings.

July 10, 2026

# Case Name Tentative 1. Cecilia and John V, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record LLC vs. Nguyen The motion by Shawn M. Olsen and Olsen Law Firm to withdraw as 24-01431827 counsel for defendant Kim-Hiem Thi Nguyen is CONTINUED to September 18, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in Department C12.

Moving counsel has not provided the required proposed order (form MC-053). (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, subds. (b), (e).) Moving counsel shall file and serve a completed proposed order (form MC- 053) on the client and parties, along with a notice of continuance, within seven calendar days, and shall file proof of service of the foregoing at least five court days prior to the continued hearing date.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share