DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV465973·santaclara·Civil·Order of Examination
Hearing 3 months agoOrdered to appear; Bench Warrant to issue if failure to appear

South Bay Auto Repair v. Cyclone Fence and Iron Inc.

Order of Examination

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500.00

Parties

PlaintiffSouth Bay Auto Repair
DefendantCyclone Fence and Iron Inc.
OtherTeresa Pereira

Ruling

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:01 25CV465973 South Bay Auto Repair Hearing: Order of Examination 1 v. Cyclone Fence and Iron Inc. On May 19, 2026, the Court ORDERED Teresa Pereira, on behalf of Defendant Judgment Debtor Cyclone Fence and Iron Inc., to appear personally in Department 16 to give information regarding a money Judgment against Judgment Debtor Cyclone Fence and Iron Inc. on May 29, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 (the “Order of Examination”).

Accordingly, Teresa Pereira is Ordered to appear in person on May 29, 2026, at 9:01 AM in Department 16 for this Examination.

If Teresa Pereira does not appear as Ordered on May 29, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 then a Civil Bench Warrant will issue against Teresa Pereira with bail set at $500.00. Specifically, if Teresa Pereira, on behalf of Defendant Judgment Debtor Cyclone Fence and Iron Inc., does not appear then Plaintiff Judgment Creditor South Bay Auto Repair is to prepare and file a Civil Bench Warrant against Teresa Pereira with bail set at $500.00 using Form CW-9002 that will be given to Plaintiff by the D16 Courtroom Clerk.

SO ORDERED.

9:01 2 9:01 3 9:01 4 9:01 5

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share