DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV477895·santaclara·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing in about 17 hoursOrdered to appear; Civil Bench Warrant if failure to appear

Hakan Bala v. Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez, et al.

Order of Examination

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,000.00

Parties

PlaintiffHakan Bala
DefendantJuan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez
OtherDiana C. Guadalupe Chipana dba Wealth Recovery Solutions

Ruling

9:01 25CV477895 Hakan Bala Hearing: Order of Examination 5 v. Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez, On June 4, 2026, the Court Ordered et al. Defendant Judgment Debtor Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez to appear personally in Department 16 to give information regarding a money judgment against him on August 19, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 (the “Order of Examination”).

Accordingly, Judgment Debtor Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez is Ordered to appear in person on August 19, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 for this Examination.

If Judgment Debtor Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez does not appear as Ordered on August 19, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 then a Civil Bench Warrant will issue against Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez with bail set at $5,000.00. Specifically, if Judgment Debtor Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez does not appear then Assignee of Record of this Judgment Diana C. Guadalupe Chipana dba Wealth Recovery Solutions (“Assignee”) is to prepare and file a Civil Bench Warrant against Juan Carlos Castillo Rodriguez with bail set at $5,000.00 using Form CW-9002 that will be given to Assignee by the D16 Courtroom Clerk.

SO ORDERED.

6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share