DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025PRTR047751·ventura·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

IN RE THE VIRGINIA MONICA RODARTE 2024 REVOCABLE TRUST

Petition Approving Attorney Fees and Costs

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentMona Lee Aguilar-Campbell
OtherVirginia Monica Rodarte 2024 Revocable Trust

Ruling

2025PRTR047751: IN RE THE VIRGINIA MONICA RODARTE 2024 REVOCABLE TRUST 05/28/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition Approving Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to Court Order Dated September 17, 2025

The Court will deny the petition for fees without prejudice. The 9/17/25 Order Confirming Title to Real Property and Bad Faith Damages states in relevant part: “Petitioners’ attorney fees and cost related to this Petition shall be deducted from Mona Lee Aguilar-Campbell’s distributive share” of the Trust. The attorneys’ fees and costs were awarded pursuant to Probate Code Section 859.

The 9/17/25 Order Granting Removal of Trustee, etc., states in part that Petitioners’ attorney fees and costs incurred in relation to that petition shall be paid from the Trust assets.

The current fee petition requests all fees and costs incurred in this proceeding and asks that the fees and costs be charged to Respondent’s distributive share of the Trust. This is not what the Court previously ordered. The petition fails to apportion the attorney fees and costs between the two separate petitions filed by Petitioners.

Further, the minute order for 9/17/25 states in relevant part: “All attorney fees, costs, damages and surcharged [sic] are reserved until accounting is filed and property is placed back in the trust.” As of 5/26/26, no account has been filed by the former trustee Mona Aguilar-Campbell. The petition does not state that the real property has been returned to the Trust. Determination of the amount of fees and costs to be awarded under section 859 should await the review of the accounting and a determination of any surcharge against the removed trustee.

For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court will deny the petition without prejudice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share