DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001315·marin·Probate·Trust
Hearing 3 months agoThe Court sustains Respondent's objection; matter continued to status of appeal.

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH ABRAHAM AND ADELAIDA SERBANESCU FAMILY TRUST

Petition for Trust Accounting; Motion to Set Aside Judgment

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
Defendant
Next hearing
Sep 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTunde Etelka Munz-Abraham
DefendantIon Cristian Abraham

Ruling

PR0001315 IN THE MATTER OF THE JOSEPH ABRAHAM AND ADELAIDA SERBANESCU FAMILY TRUST

1. Petition for Trust Accounting, filed by Tunde Etelka Munz-Abraham on 12/22/25.

2. Motion to Set Aside Judgment Under Code of Civil Procedure § 473(d), filed by Tunde Etelka Munz-Abraham on 11/6/25.

Ruling. The Court sustains Respondent Ion Cristian Abraham’s objection to Appellant’s Proposed Settled Statement in the Response filed on May 15, 2026. Section III. D, entitled “Matters not Challenged by Court or Respondent’s Counsel” of the Proposed Settled Statement is ordered stricken from the Proposed Settled Statement as inaccurate and a misrepresentation made by Appellant Tunde Etelka Munz-Abraham.

Appellant is directed to submit to opposing counsel for Respondent, a revised Proposed Settled Statement as modified above, as well as a proposed order certifying the Proposed Settled Statement, by no later than June 4, 2026. The Proposed Settled Statement shall bear the signature of Respondent’s counsel approving as to form the Proposed Settled Statement. By no later than June 11, 2026, Appellant is ordered to submit the revised Proposed Settled Statement approved by Respondent’s Counsel and proposed order certifying the Proposed Settled Statement to the Court for review. A failure by Appellant to comply with the above order will constitute a waiver of Appellant’s request for a certified Settled Statement from this Court.

This matter is now continued to September 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. for status of appeal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share