DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV441895·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

BPM, LLP v. SAKUU Corporation

motion to enter judgment by stipulation

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,225,421.51$1,175,953.13$41,158.38$8,250.00$60

Parties

PlaintiffBPM, LLP
DefendantSAKUU Corporation

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: May 28, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 5 24CV441895 BPM, LLP v. Plaintiff BPM, LLP’s motion to enter judgment by stipulation. (Code Civ. SAKUU Corporation Proc., § 664.6.) Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. The parties signed a stipulation for entry of judgment in 2025, under which defendant Sakuu Corporation agreed to make installment payments to pay off a debt. A declaration in support of the motion indicates defendant stopped making payments. That declaration seeks judgment for $1,225,421.51, consisting of: a principal balance of $1,175,953.13; $41,158.38 in interest; $8,250.00 in attorney fees; and $60 in costs.

On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Moving party to submit proposed order and proposed judgment. Line 6 25CV460409 Vi Tran v. Hyundai Click LINE 6 or scroll down for ruling. Motor America et al. Line 7 24CV450371 Midland Credit Plaintiff’s motion to set aside default judgment and dismiss the action with Management Inc. v. prejudice. Notice is proper and the motion is unopposed. A trial court Pascal Rose must grant relief from default if a timely application for relief from default is “accompanied by an attorney’s sworn affidavit attesting to the attorney’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect.” (Code Civ.

Proc., § 473, subd. (b).) A declaration by plaintiff’s counsel indicates the parties settled the matter before default judgment was entered. On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The default judgment entered on July 18, 2025 is set aside and vacated. On plaintiff’s request, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The court will prepare the order.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share