DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV433040·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Jane Doe v. ROE 2 et al.

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 8, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJane Doe
DefendantROE 2

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: May 28, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

9:00 A.M. LINE CASE # CASE TITLE RULING # Line 1 25CV464307 Jessica Martinez v. Click LINE 1 or scroll down for ruling. Hyperice Mexico Holdings, LLC et al. Line 2 24CV433040 Jane Doe v. ROE 2 et By stipulation and order, the matter is CONTINUED to October 8, 2026, al. at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. The parties are ordered to inform the court no later than August 27, 2026, whether this motion and the motion for summary judgment also set for October 8, 2026, will remain as set. The court will prepare the order.

Line 3 25CV468318 Elizabeth Tan v. Plaintiff’s motion to compel deposition of defendant’s person most Volkswagen Group knowledgeable. Notice is proper and the motion is opposed by defendant. of America, Inc., a Defendant’s opposition indicates the deposition occurred in January 2026, New Jersey meaning the motion is moot. Instead of a reply brief, plaintiff filed a Corporation et al. notice that the matter “has been taken off calendar.” Plaintiff is admonished to withdraw moot motions much earlier in the future so that the court’s limited law and motion reservations can be opened for use by other litigants.

The motion is DENIED AS MOOT. The court will prepare the order. Line 4 23CV427200 Walter Kubon et al vs Click LINE 4 or scroll down for ruling. Rosalie Guancione

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share