Sheila Andrews vs Steven M. Nailen, et al.
Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Hon. Stephanie L. Jamieson Courtroom 8
627 W. 21st Street, Merced
Wednesday, June 3, 2026 8:15 a.m.
The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.
2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.
Case No. Title / Description
21CV-03285 Sheila Andrews vs Steven M. Nailen, et al.
Motion for Summary Judgment
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5, Defendant’s declaration submitted in support of his motion for summary judgment must be sworn under penalty of perjury.
The declaration of Steven M. Nailen was not made under penalty of perjury. The mandatory remedy is to provide Defendant the opportunity to resubmit his declaration to comply with section 2015.5.
Accordingly, this matter is CONTINUED to June 24, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8 for hearing on the motion for summary judgment. Defendant is ordered to resubmit his declaration and serve a copy of Plaintiff, should he wish for it to be considered by this Court in evaluating the merits of the motion for summary judgment, no later than June 17, 2026.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”