DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PR-0302·slo·Civil·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

Estate of: Margaret Johnsen

Motion for Sanctions Against Attorney

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentEvelyn Johnsen Crafton
PetitionerStephen Syson

Attorneys

Henry Dearingfor Respondent

Ruling

Estate of: Margaret Johnsen, 24PR-0302

Hearing: Motion for Sanctions Against Attorney

Date: May 27, 2026

In March 2026, the Court held an evidentiary hearing regarding the validity of a will proffered by Evelyn Johnsen Crafton. Stephen Syson objected to the will’s admission. On April 2, 2026, the Court issued a ruling admitting the will to probate.

Currently on calendar is Syson’s motion for sanctions against Crafton’s attorney, Henry Dearing. Syson argues Dearing engaged in ex parte communications with the Court’s “probate researcher.” Syson argues that during mediation, Dearing informed the mediator that “he had spoken with the Judge’s Probate Researcher,” who allegedly informed Dearing that “the Court was ‘on the side’ of his client.” (Syson Decl., ¶¶ 2, 3.)

Dearing “categorially” denies Syson’s claims and explains that during mediation, he directed the mediator to the Court’s various rulings and directives which were available to all parties “as set forth in this Court’s Probate Notes.” Dearing responds he believes Syson first learned of the probate notes during mediation.

The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions and finds Syson has failed to show sanctions against Dearing are warranted. It appears that Syson misunderstood, or was unaware of, the Court’s procedure for publicly posting probate notes online prior to each hearing. The motion is denied.

ORDER

The motion is denied.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share