DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR0283·eldorado·Civil·Trust Administration
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

ESTATE OF JACK PEFLEY

Accounting Hearing; Surcharge; Appointment of Trustee

Hearing date
Jun 15, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerAnthony Pefley
OtherSally Pefley
DefendantYue Tang
OtherShannan M. Pefley
OtherJack Louis Pefley (Jr.)
OtherDonna Lee Pefley

Ruling

June 15, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

8. 25PR0283 ESTATE OF JACK PEFLEY Accounting Hearing, Surcharge, Appointment of Trustee

Petitioner Anthony Pefley (“petitioner”) alleges he is the successor trustee of the SAP Family Trust (the “Trust”). On March 5, 2026, he petitioned the Court to issue instructions, compel the return of trust property, impose double damages for bad-faith taking, order an accounting, and grant all equitable relief necessary. The matter was continued from May 4, 2026, because petitioner had not submitted a copy of the Trust for the court’s review. Later on May 4, 2026, petitioner submitted a copy of the Trust.

On May 7, 2026, petitioner submitted a copy of the original “short form” of the Trust, claiming that petitioner’s name does not appear as the successor trustee but it “should.” Petitioner also submitted a copy of the durable power of attorney for health care executed by Sally Pefley on July 9, 1997. Proof of service filed March 6, 2026, shows the petition was served upon counsel for Yue Tang. In a letter to the court received January 20, 2026, counsel indicated that Ms. Tang is the trustee. The copy of the Trust filed May 4, 2026, shows that the remainder beneficiaries include: (1) Shannan M.

Pefley; (2) petitioner; (3) Jack Louis Pefley (Jr.); and (4) Donna Lee Pefley. To date, there is no proof of service of the instant petition on the other beneficiaries. There are only proofs of service filed March 10, 2026, for the document entitled, “Removal of Current Trustee,” upon Shannan Pefley and Jack Pefley.

TENTATIVE RULING #8: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M., MONDAY, JUNE 15, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE, AT WHICH TIME THE COURT WILL INQUIRE PETITIONER REGARDING THE PARTIES TO THIS CASE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS.

9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share