HERNANDEZ v. GENERAL MOTORS
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint; Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 22, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 24CV02816
HERNANDEZ v. GENERAL MOTORS
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Parties to appear. Plaintiff should be prepared to provide information as to why this motion was made 18 months after the decision in Rodriguez v. FCA US LLC (2024) 17 Cal.5th 189, and two months after defendant’s motion for summary judgment was filed.
No. 25CV01089
SC BLOOM NETWORK, INC. v. OLD REPUBLIC TITLE CO.
DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs’ claims are time-barred. The motion to strike is denied as moot.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”