DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2023-01334230·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

TORRES VS. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR ADJUDICATION

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
C32
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTORRES
DefendantCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
DefendantMALCO MAINTENANCE

Ruling

be filed by Defendant no later than May 12, 2026; however, no compliance has been shown.

As previously indicated, the Court will not turn to the merits of the demurrer until strict compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41 is shown. Upon such a showing, Defendant may seek to have this matter reset.

11. TORRES VS. CITY OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR HUNTINGTON BEACH ADJUDICATION

Regarding Defendant Malco Maintenance’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the City of Huntington Beach’s Cross-Complaint, the Court entered an order approving the good-faith settlement between Plaintiff and moving party on 5/15/26. Movant’s counsel shall appear at the hearing to state whether the motion should remain on the Court’s calendar in light of the approval of the good-faith settlement. If Movant is maintaining the motion, the Court will continue the hearing to allow moving Defendant and Cross- Complainant City to file supplemental briefs addressing the effect of the good faith settlement on the City’s Cross-Complaint.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share