DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0000854·marin·FamilyLaw·Family Law / Visitation
Hearing 3 months agoMatter taken off calendar and dismissed with prejudice.

COLLEEN M. PROPPE v. BRIAN T. COSTELLO

Request for Order – Visitation

Hearing date
May 22, 2026
Department
E
Prevailing
Defendant
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCOLLEEN M. PROPPE
DefendantBRIAN T. COSTELLO

Ruling

As the Court made clear in its Findings and Order After Hearing on 6/14/2024 and 10/25/2024, this Court has no jurisdiction over this matter, and Petitioner is not entitled to any of the relief she has requested. Petitioner appealed the Court’s decision to the California Court of Appeal, First District, and the appeal was dismissed Therefore, the Court orders as follows:

This matter is taken off calendar, and the case is dismissed, with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

The Court will prepare the order.

Any party who disagrees with the Court's tentative ruling and wishes to have oral argument must notify the Court at (415) 444-7046 and opposing counsel (or if the opposing party is selfrepresented, notice must be given directly to the opposing party) of their intent to appear at the hearing for oral argument by 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, as required by Marin County Superior Court Family Law Local Rules 7.12(B) and (C). Notice may be given by telephone or in person. Absent proper notice, no oral argument will be permitted. If no request for oral argument is made, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, persons who requested oral argument must appear for the hearing in person or remotely via Zoom, in accordance with the Court website guidelines. If appearing remotely via Zoom (video or telephone), you are responsible for ensuring you have adequate connectivity; the Court may proceed in a party’s absence if technical issues arise. Proper Zoom etiquette and courtroom decorum are required, and failure to comply may result in the hearing being halted and an order to appear in person being made.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share