Claim of Exemption
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 05/27/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE 6 25CV458649 Steven Mendoza MOTION TO COMPEL v. FCA US LLC Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defense contends it served initial disclosure production on May 29, 2025 and a proposed Stipulation and Protective Order (SPO); Plaintiff returned an executed copy of SPO on March 17, 2026; Defendant produced confidential materials on March 18, 2026
The motion to compel appears to be moot. Plaintiff has not filed a timely Reply to Defendant’s Opposition.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel and sanctions are DENIED.
Defendant to prepare the final proposed order accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-0202, within 7 days of the date of the hearing.
LINE 7 || || DEMURRER
Please scroll down to Line 7 and 8
LINE 8 || || MOTION TO STRIKE
Please scroll down to Line 7 and 8
9:01 LINE 1 22CV401542 DNF Associates, LLC CLAIM OF EXEMPTION v. Axel Rodriguez Judgment debtor’s claim of exemption is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. No exempt funds have been identified in the claim. The Court finds that Defendant applicant’s financial statement shows sufficient non-exempt funds to satisfy a reasonable withholding per pay period. The Court orders withholding in the amount of $40.00 per pay period ($160.00 per month).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”