DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV095403·alameda·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 3 months agoDROPPED

TELECARE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. vs FREDKIN

Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses

Hearing date
May 26, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTelecare Corporation
DefendantFredkin

Ruling

24CV095403: TELECARE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. vs FREDKIN 05/26/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Telecare Corporation, a California Corporation (Plaintiff) CRS# 183759986376 in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 05/21/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

The Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Telecare Corporation, a California Corporation (Plaintiff) CRS# 183759986376 scheduled for 05/26/2026 is vacated.

The motion of Plaintiff Telecare to compel discovery is DROPPED. The parties have agreed to appoint a discovery referee. The parties may raise the discovery issues in the motion with the discovery referee.

PLEASE NOTE: This tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if uncontested by 04:00pm the day before your hearing. If you wish to contest the tentative ruling, then both notify opposing counsel directly and the court at the eCourt portal found on the court’s website: www.alameda.courts.ca.gov.

If you have contested the tentative ruling or your tentative ruling reads, “parties to appear,” please use the following link to access your hearing at the appropriate date and time: https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/department21. If no party has contested the tentative ruling, then no appearance is necessary.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share