DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV006784·sacramento·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoDROPPED

HAMMLER vs ALLISON, et al.

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories and Production of Documents

Hearing date
May 28, 2025
Department
54
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 11, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAllen Hammler
DefendantMcGhee-Corter
DefendantN. Fah

Ruling

23CV006784: HAMMLER vs ALLISON, et al. 05/28/2025 Hearing on Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories and Production of Documents in Department 54

Tentative Ruling

Tentative Ruling: The Court has adopted the following procedure for hearings in Department 28 for selfrepresented incarcerated parties. The clerk shall fax a copy of the tentative ruling to the litigation coordinator on or before the date of the scheduled hearing. The litigation coordinator shall provide the tentative ruling to Plaintiff Allen Hammler within 48 hours of receiving it. The hearing date shall automatically be continued two weeks for oral argument. The continuance date will always be an appearance required hearing so that Plaintiff Allen Hammler need not request oral argument.

The Litigation Coordinator shall make Plaintiff Allen Hamler available, by Zoom or telephonically, at 9:00 a.m. on the date of the continued hearing date, which will be June 11, 2025. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom ID: 16039062174. Plaintiff in pro per Allen Hammler’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to compel further responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories to Defendant McGhee-Corter and second set of requests for production of documents to Defendant N.

Fah is DROPPED. Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 2.31(E), which provides, “When simultaneously filing multiple discovery-related motions in the same case with the same hearing date, each motion shall be filed as a separate document and a separate filing fee paid for each. Parties may not combine motions pertaining to different types of discovery within the same document. Failure to comply with any part of this rule regarding discovery motions may, in the discretion of the court, be grounds for the motions being dropped without consideration.” (Local Rule 2.31(E).)

The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, or further notice is required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share