TURNER NOWAK v. DENNIS H. KLEIN, ET AL

Plaintiff Turner Nowak filed on February 18, 2026, a Motion to Enforce Settlement and entry of Judgment pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure §664.6. Plaintiffs argue that Defendants Dennis Klein and Boundary Solutions, Inc. failed to comply with the terms of a settlement agreement signed by Plaintiff and Defendants on October 2, 2023, ("Settlement Agreement") and pay to Plaintiff $56,000. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to make any payments under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including a $30,000 payment due October 2, 2023, and twenty-six monthly payments of $1,000 per month beginning August 1, 2023.

Defendants have not filed a response nor an opposition to the motion to enforce the settlement. The failure to oppose is considered consent to the granting of the motion. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.54(c); Local Rule Marin, Civil 2.8G.1.) Plaintiff’s motion is therefore GRANTED.

Plaintiff is to lodge a proposed order for consideration.

Should any party wish to contest this tentative, the matter will be heard on May 29, 2026, at 1:30 pm in this department. Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(A), (B), which provides that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing.

Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(A), (B), which provides that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all parties have

been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.

IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department L. For routine appearances, the parties may access Department L for video conference via a link on the court website. Kindly turn your camera on when your case is called and make sure the party or lawyer making the appearance is properly identified on the screen.

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a good connection and that they are available for the hearing while using the virtual remote courtroom. If the connection is inadequate, the Court may proceed with the hearing in the party’s absence. If it is determined that you are driving your car during the hearing, you will be removed from the virtual courtroom. (Yes, this happens).