DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21CV376477·santaclara·ComplexCivil·Class Action
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Rodriguez-Lopez v. Toray Advanced Composites, Inc.

Final Approval

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
22
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRodriguez-Lopez
DefendantToray Advanced Composites, Inc.

Ruling

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 21CV376477 Rodriguez-Lopez v. Toray Advanced Motion: Final Approval Composites, Inc. (Class Action) Granted May 15, 2026

Parties need not appear LINE 2 21CV379924 Flores v. VP Security Services, Inc. Motion: Withdraw as (PAGA) attorney is GRANTED

Click on line 2 for tentative ruling LINE 3 23CV424953 Schenk v. Smith's GTS, Inc. (Class Motion: Preliminary Action/PAGA) Approval is GRANTED

Click on line 3 for tentative ruling LINE 4 24CV434602 Urzua v. Lyten, Inc. (Class Hearing: Motion for Action/PAGA) Approval is GRANTED

Click on line 4 for tentative ruling LINE 5 25CV467513 Bucks County Employees' Retirement Motion: Consolidate is System et al vs Timothy Cook et al DENIED

Click on line 5 for tentative ruling lines 5,7 and 8 LINE 6 25CV468388 Delmy Landverde vs Lusamerica Hearing: Motion to Compel Foods, Inc., a California corporation Arbitration is GRANTED

Click on line 6 for tentative ruling LINE 7 25CV472876 Kevin Anguka vs Timothy Cook et al Motion: Consolidate

Click on line 5 LINE 8 25CV473618 City of Hialeah Employees' Motion: Consolidate Retirement System et al vs Timothy Cook et al Click on line 5 LINE 9 LINE 10 LINE 11 LINE 12 LINE 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share