Motion to compel compliance with discovery order; Motion for sanctions
To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to
Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings
LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 25CV424190 AI Technology Defendant petitions this court to compel plaintiff to produce documents set six. 1 Systems vs. Renesas Court finds that Defendant’s request for Production No. 83, 84, 85, 86 is overbroad. Electronics America Court finds that Defendant’s request for Production No. 87 (every document supporting allegation that defendant provided Cyberon with confidential information belonging to AITS) is relevant—however, Plaintiff has answered that there are no such documents in its possession.
Similarly, Defendant’s request for Production No. 88 (every document that supports allegation that Defendant downloaded AITS underlying codes) is relevant—however, Plaintiff has answered that there are no such documents in its possession. Defendant’s petition to compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents from Set Six is DENIED. 9:00 24CV444671 XH Industrial v? 2 Capital Asset Exchange 9:00 24CV450596 Daniel Skelton, et.al. See below 3 v. FCA US LLC, et.al
9:00 24CV453728 Anthony Flaminiano Plaintiff moves this court to compel Defendant Mercedes Benz to comply with 4 v. Mercedes Benz, Court’s previous Discovery Order and requests monetary sanctions. On October 9, et.al. 2025, this Court ordered Defendant to produce its Person Most Qualified for a deposition within 20 calendar days of the court’s order. Defendant failed to provide a date to comply with the court’s order until March 16, 2026. Plaintiff’s motion to comply with Court’s previous Order within 5 calendar days of this order is GRANTED.
Court also orders Defendant Mercedes-Benz to pay $2,635.00 within 5 days of the hearing of this motion. 9:00 25CV461473 Wells Fargo Bank vs. Off calendar 5 Edwin Punzalan 9:00 25CV463219 Thi Thuy Dung Cao Plaintiff moves this court for leave to amend complaint. Defendant has no 6 vs. The City of San objection. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to amend the Jose complaint within 10 days.
Calendar Line 2
Case Name: XH Industrial Co., LTD v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”