DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24611555·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL

Motion For Order To Compel Plaintiff Maika Marapao To Respond To Form Interrogatories, Set One Propounded By Defendants And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$900

Parties

PlaintiffJACKLYN IBAY
PlaintiffMAIKA MARAPAO
DefendantFIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7
DefendantCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.
DefendantRELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
DefendantTIMOTHY SCOTT WILSON
DefendantKARINA GUERRERO PEREZ

Attorneys

Karen A. Raglandfor Defendant

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Thursday, July 02, 2026, Line 5, DEFENDANT CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P., TIMOTHY SCOTT WILSON, KARINA GUERRERO PEREZ, MISSION BAY BLOCK 7's Motion For Order To Compel Plaintiff Maika Marapao To Respond To Form Interrogatories, Set One Propounded By Defendants And For Monetary Sanctions.

3 - The unopposed motion to compel plaintiff Maika Marapao to respond to form interrogatories, set one, is granted for good cause shown in the moving papers. Marapao shall respond within two weeks of service of this order. The failure to respond to discovery lacks substantial justification. Marapao shall pay $900 in sanctions to defendants within 30 days of service of this order.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share