DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV481133·santaclara·Civil·Collection
Hearing 3 months agoORDERED

Shaleen Development Company, LLLP v. Kushal Sharma

Order of Examination

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,000.00

Parties

PlaintiffShaleen Development Company, LLLP
DefendantKushal Sharma

Ruling

9:01 25CV481133 Shaleen Development Company, Hearing: Order of Examination 4 LLLP v. On February 13, 2026, the Court Ordered Kushal Sharma Defendant Judgment Debtor Kushal Sharma to appear personally in Department 16 to give information regarding a money judgment against him on May 27, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 (the “Order of Examination”).

Accordingly, Judgment Debtor Kushal Sharma is Ordered to appear in person on May 27, 2026, at 9:01 AM in Department 16 for this Examination.

If Judgment Debtor Kushal Sharma does not appear as Ordered on May 27, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 then a Civil Bench Warrant will issue against Kushal Sharma with bail set at $2,000.00. Specifically, if Judgment Debtor Kushal Sharma does not appear then Plaintiff Judgment Creditor Shaleen Development Company, LLLP is to prepare and file a Civil Bench Warrant against Kushal Sharma with bail set at $2,000.00 using Form CW-9002 that will be given to Plaintiff by the D16 Courtroom Clerk.

SO ORDERED. 9:01 5

9:00 21CV389678 Isaac A. Anjejo Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike 1 v. Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Daniel Nelson, et al. Complaint

See Line 1 below for complete tentative ruling. After the hearing, the Court will prepare and file the formal order.

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share