CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. BROOKDALE RESORTS INC.

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 21, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 24CV03211

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC. v. BROOKDALE RESORTS INC.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS DEMAND FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION, INSPECTION AND COPYING OF DOCUMENTS, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The unopposed motion is granted. Defendant Brookdale Resorts Inc. is ordered to produce responsive documents to document request nos. 1 and 3 no later than June 22, 2026, in compliance with its promise to produce. (Garcia Declaration ¶¶ 2-8.)

Sanctions are imposed against defendant Brookdale Resorts Inc. in the amount of $1,075.45, payable no later than June 22, 2026. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.010, subd. (d), 2023.030, subd. (a).)

No. 24CV03113

HOLLOWAY v. SAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, et al.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

The writ petition is denied.

I. BACKGROUND