DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678726·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

1045 MISSION, L.P. VS. MOTYA ALI ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 27, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 30, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1045 MISSION, L.P.
DefendantMOTYA ALI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678726 - June 27, 2025 Hearing date: June 27, 2025 Case number: CUD25678726 Case title: 1045 MISSION, L.P. VS. MOTYA ALI ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678726 | Case Title: | | 1045 MISSION, L.P. VS. MOTYA ALI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 27, 2025, line 17. Defendant's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is CONTINUED to June 30, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. on the Court's own motion.

A tentative ruling will be issued on June 27, 2025 at 3:00 p.m. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share