DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622373·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

1000 VAN NESS LP VS. 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 15, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1000 VAN NESS LP
Defendant5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 16, 2025 line 3. DEFENDANT 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT is CONTINUED to August 15, 2025 to be heard with other pending motions. Defendant shall file, no later than August 1, 2025, a supplemental brief no longer than 5 pages in length, briefing the Court on the issue of standing and whether 1000 Van Ness LP is able to maintain this suit as is. Plaintiff shall file a response, if any, no later than August 8 at 9:00 a.m. and explain with cited authority how 1000 Van Ness LP, who is no longer the acting PPO, can maintain this suit. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share