DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678423·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

BWF FORGE TL PROPERTIES OWNER, LLC VS. JASON SKELTON ET AL

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Hearing date
Jun 13, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBWF FORGE TL PROPERTIES OWNER, LLC
DefendantJASON SKELTON

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 13, 2025 line 13.

DEFENDANT JASON SKELTON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. No opposition filed.

The Complaint fails to state a cause of action. (CCP 438(c)(1)(B)(ii).) The Notice to Pay Rent or Quit is fatally defective because the Form 1007 Rent Board attachment is not the version that was in effect at the time the Notice was served. The outdated Form 1007 contains materially different information than the current version and is not the mandatory attachment referred to by Section 37.9(c) of the Rent Ordinance as of the time of service. This defect cannot be cured by amending the pleadings.

Judgment shall enter for defendant and against plaintiff. =(501/VMH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share