DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677688·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

A & E ENTERPRISES, LLC VS. WYNSHIP HILLIER ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Compelling Further Response To Written Interrogatories And For Monetary Sanction

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 23, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffA & E ENTERPRISES, LLC
DefendantWYNSHIP HILLIER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677688 - June 16, 2025 Hearing date: June 16, 2025 Case number: CUD25677688 Case title: A & E ENTERPRISES, LLC VS. WYNSHIP HILLIER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677688 | Case Title: | | A & E ENTERPRISES, LLC VS. WYNSHIP HILLIER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Compelling Further Response To Written Interrogatories And For Monetary Sanction | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 16, 2025 line 8.

DEFENDANT WYNSHIP HILLIER, M.S. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER RESPONSE TO WRITTEN INTERROGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTION is CONTINUED to June 23, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. on the Court's own motion.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share