DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678491·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

IAN WALLACE VS. ROSHINI PILLAY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant'S Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories - General - Set One, And Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 13, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffIAN WALLACE
DefendantROSHINI PILLAY ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678491 - August 7, 2025 Hearing date: August 7, 2025 Case number: CUD25678491 Case title: IAN WALLACE VS. ROSHINI PILLAY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678491 | Case Title: | | IAN WALLACE VS. ROSHINI PILLAY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant'S Responses To Plaintiff'S Form Interrogatories - General - Set One, And Request For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 7, 2025, line 6.

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories - General - Set One, and Request for Monetary Sanctions is CONTINUED to August 13, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share