DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677417·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoSUSTAINED, subject to opposition, with leave to amend within 5 days

CLARA LUZ MIRANDA VS. JESSY PEREIRA

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCLARA LUZ MIRANDA
DefendantJESSY PEREIRA

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 2, 2025 line 3. DEFENDANT JESSY PEREIRA, AN INDIVIDUAL DEMURRER TO Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED, subject to opposition, with leave to amend within 5 days of notice of entry of order to allege that the grounds enumerated in SFRO 37.9(a)(2) and (3) are the dominant motive for recovering possession of the premises. Defendant's argument that the failure to allege an opportunity to cure lacks merit since the third amended complaint alleges that the breaches of the lease are incurable. =(501/HEK) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share