DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676541·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR

ROBERT B PITTS L.P VS. NIJAH REED ET AL

Motion For Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Jul 28, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT B PITTS L.P
DefendantNIJAH REED

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 28, 2025. Line 4. PLAINTIFF ROBERT B PITTS L.P Motion For Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation is OFF CALENDAR. This matter was previously continued for the moving party to file a proof of service by the person who personally delivered the moving papers clearly stating when, where, and how the papers were delivered, no later than July 23, 2025. No such proof of service has been filed.(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share