DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24674580·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED in part. Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $70,020.

HILDA DUDUM VS. VALLEY JUICE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMTIED LIABILITY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Stipulated Judgment Against Defendants Valley Juice, Llc And Dwayne Redmon

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$70,020

Parties

PlaintiffHILDA DUDUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE HELEN G. DUDUM FAMILY TRUST
DefendantVALLEY JUICE, LLC
DefendantDWAYNE REDMON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24674580 - June 2, 2025 Hearing date: June 2, 2025 Case number: CUD24674580 Case title: HILDA DUDUM VS. VALLEY JUICE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMTIED LIABILITY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24674580 | Case Title: | | HILDA DUDUM VS. VALLEY JUICE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMTIED LIABILITY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Stipulated Judgment Against Defendants Valley Juice, Llc And Dwayne Redmon; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 2, 2025 line 2.

PLAINTIFF HILDA DUDUM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE HELEN G. DUDUM FAMILY TRUST NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS VALLEY JUICE, LLC AND DWAYNE REDMON; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT is GRANTED in part.

Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $70,020. All parties stipulated to the principal sum of $70,020 in the settlement agreement, but the settlement agreement does not contain a stipulation to interest. Defendants breached the Settlement Agreement by not making any payments, as required by the settlement agreement. Judgment shall enter against Defendants for $70,020 per Cal. Code Civ. Proc. sec. 664.6. =(501/HEK)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share