DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23606781·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

JENNIFER SPALDING VS. VAN NESS HAYES ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 24, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJENNIFER SPALDING
DefendantVAN NESS HAYES ASSOCIATES LLC
DefendantEMERALD FUND INC.
DefendantEMERALD VAN NESS HAYES LLC
DefendantMARC BABSIN
Defendant150 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION
DefendantSILVANUS ERICKSON
DefendantNATIONAL REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC
DefendantNREA HOLDINGS, LLC
DefendantNATIONAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 12, 2025. Line 2. DEFENDANT EMERALD FUND INC., EMERALD VAN NESS HAYES LLC, MARC BABSIN, 150 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, VAN NESS HAYES ASSOCIATES, LLC, SILVANUS ERICKSON, NATIONAL REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, LLC, NREA HOLDINGS, LLC, NATIONAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, LLC DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is CONTINUED to June 24, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the opposing party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers no later than June 13, 2025, with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Moving papers and reply received) =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share