DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24616313·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice pursuant to CCP 1005(b).

ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 31, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANDRE WILLIAMS
DefendantSAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant1815 EGBERT AVE

Attorneys

Monica Castillo(Wilson Elser, LLP)for Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24616313 - July 31, 2025 Hearing date: July 31, 2025 Case number: CGC24616313 Case title: ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24616313 | Case Title: | | ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-31 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 31, 2025, line 3.

Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Answer to Amended Complaint is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice pursuant to CCP 1005(b). The Court further notes that the documents were mailed to Monica Castillo at the Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco. Ms. Castillo, counsel for Defendants, works at Wilson Elser, LLP, not at the Housing Authority. =(501/GLW)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share