DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24616313·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice.

ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE

Hearing date
Jan 12, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANDRE WILLIAMS
PlaintiffTIMOJENE WATSON
DefendantSAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24616313 - January 12, 2026 Hearing date: January 12, 2026 Case number: CGC24616313 Case title: ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24616313 | Case Title: | | ANDRE WILLIAMS ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY 1815 EGBERT AVE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-12 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 12, 2026.

Line 2.2. PLAINTIFF ANDRE WILLIAMS, TIMOJENE WATSON MOTION TO STRIKE is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share