DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614737·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

GREEN MATRIX SECURITIES LLC ASSIGNEE VS. JENNIFER CHEUNG JEW ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Amend Judgment To Correct Name Of Judgment Debtor Joanna Cheung To Add Her Alias Lampo Joanna Cheung

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGREEN MATRIX SECURITIES LLC ASSIGNEE
DefendantJENNIFER CHEUNG JEW
DefendantJoanna Cheung

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24614737 - June 30, 2025 Hearing date: June 30, 2025 Case number: CGC24614737 Case title: GREEN MATRIX SECURITIES LLC ASSIGNEE VS. JENNIFER CHEUNG JEW ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614737 | Case Title: | | GREEN MATRIX SECURITIES LLC ASSIGNEE VS. JENNIFER CHEUNG JEW ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-30 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Amend Judgment To Correct Name Of Judgment Debtor Joanna Cheung To Add Her Alias Lampo Joanna Cheung | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for June 30, 2025, line 3.

Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment to Correct Name of Judgment Debtor Joanna Cheung to Add her Alias Lamp Joanna Cheung is GRANTED. No opposition on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share