DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24613043·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoOVERRULED as to cross-defendant Oscar Gonzalez and SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to cross-defendants Delia Carbajal and Luigi Mercado.

OSCAR GONZALEZ VS. THEMISTOCLES CHILICAS ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jun 5, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffOSCAR GONZALEZ
DefendantTHEMISTOCLES CHILICAS
DefendantDELIA CARBAJAL
DefendantLUIGI MERCADO

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 5, 2025 line 3.

CROSS DEFENDANT OSCAR GONZALEZ, DELIA CARBAJAL, LUIGI MERCADO DEMURRER TO Amended CROSS COMPLAINT is OVERRULED as to cross-defendant Oscar Gonzalez and SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to cross-defendants Delia Carbajal and Luigi Mercado.

Cross-defendants' argument that judicial notice has been taken of the terms of a lease different from the lease attached to first amended cross-complaint lacks merit for two reasons. First, even if true, cross-complainants are not precluded from alleging that a different lease is the operative lease. Second, while judicial notice may be taken of the existence of a lease, judicial notice does not extend to the truth of the terms of a lease.

Neither the language of Civil Code 1941.2 nor any case law construing that statute creates any contractual obligations on a non-signatory to a lease. Leave to amend is denied because cross-complainants have not shown any reasonable possibility that they can state a viable contract claim against Ms. Carbajal and Mr. Mercado. =(501/HEK)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share